Search for: "Take Care Health Systems, Inc."
Results 1501 - 1511
of 1,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
ClientEarth contends this strategy will harm the long-term competitiveness of Shell itself and constitutes a breach of the directors’ statutory duties to: promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole (section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (“CA 2006”)); and exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in the discharge of their duties (section 174 of the CA 2006). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
However, the Fed, the Treasury Department, and the FDIC acted forcefully and took extraordinary measures to reassure markets and depositors of the safety and security of the banking system. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
§ 1324a(h)(3) -- then the Secretary obviously does not cause the President to violate his "take Care" duty if he decides to exercise that statutorily conferred discretion.And if, on the other hand, Congress has clearly precluded the Secretary from exercising such discretion, then that's an ordinary statutory/APA violation, just as is alleged every day in countless other cases challenging agency actions. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Jackson’s Women’s Health cited an amicus brief authored by Liberty Counsel in its ruling. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Key Findings The Ohio Commercial Activity Tax, a 0.26 percent tax on business gross receipts above $1 million, is a throwback to an earlier era of taxation, bringing back a tax type that had been in steady retreat for nearly a century. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
Conservative /Lib-Dem 1,710,000 Financial Times Nikkei Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
New York Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2007. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
It takes its full meaning from our caselaw, including decisions predating the enactment ofthe Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of1996 (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
McDorman, No. 05-41347 In a suit brought by former directors of a bank alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and state-law claims, a take nothing judgment against defendants is affirmed, primarily as: 1) defendants properly raised the in pari delicto defense; 2) contrary to directors' claim, in pari delicto is a cognizable defense to a civil RICO claim; 3) the district court properly followed the Bateman Eichler formulation of in pari… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Sebelius Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-2281 September 19, 2011 Judge: Seymour Areas of Law: Contracts, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law This was the second appeal in litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe). [read post]
