Search for: "The Good Business Corp." Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 1:56 pm by Matthew Moriarty
An aerospace company found this out the hard way in Global Aerospace Corp., B-414514 (July 3, 2017). [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 6:16 am by Dan Harris
This leads us to conclude the company is either lying or operating illegally, neither of which makes for a good investment or business partner. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:00 pm by Buckingham
While Quill Corp. remains good law– and presumably the Ohio Tax Commissioner will not enforce this unconstitutional provision – there is clearly growing efforts from the states to contest the existing physical presence requirement. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
This came as more good news for employers, who have long sought such guidance as to how the law applies in specific circumstances. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:43 am by Dan Pinnington
As a result, the real estate community is at the same time a business to-business (B2B) and a business-to-consumer (B2C) system. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
Oh provided evidence that others use the term "bag corp. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
 See In re Old Glory Condom Corp., 26 USPQ 2d 1216, 1220, n. 3 (TTAB 1993) (‘[I]ssuance of a trademark registration . . . is not a government imprimatur’). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm by Amy Howe and Mark Walsh
Today, a party, but we will be back to business as usual on Monday morning. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by Andrew M. Piper
In other words, the B Corp model may be a solid option for entrepreneurs looking to raise capital without fear of losing control of the mission of their business. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by Andrew M. Piper
In other words, the B Corp model may be a solid option for entrepreneurs looking to raise capital without fear of losing control of the mission of their business. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm by Mark Walsh
The real R.B.G. delivers the opinion in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]