Search for: "US v. George" Results 1501 - 1520 of 6,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
" Kavanaugh was likely referring to his service as a White House official in the George W. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:38 am
For members retiring from active duty, the formula to be used, as set forth by Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), is the same formula described in Whitfield v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am by Laura Sandwell
R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4 March 2014. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm by Josh Blackman
And Justice Kavanaugh's restraint and compassionate conservatism—truly the hallmarks of the George W. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:39 am
  In the late 1970s, did I really want to read a story about someone's female friend named George, who must be a tomboy because she had short hair and wore "dungarees"? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:26 pm
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendants, and its agents, distributors, representatives, assigns, and anyone acting in concert with them, from using the names, images, likenesses, signatures, personae, and other related indicia of deceased baseball legends Jackie Robinson ("Robinson"), Lou Gehrig ("Gehrig"), Mel Ott ("Ott"), Jimmie Foxx ("Foxx"), Rogers Hornsby ("Hornsby"), Thurman Munson ("Munson"), George Sisler… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:56 am by Ted Frank
Moreover, the IPO failure rate on these two stock markets was lower than it was with better regulated US IPOs later in the 20th century. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:42 am by emagraken
Northern Health Authority (Prince George Regional Hospital), 2010 BCSC 1817; Schwartz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
Today's unequivocal opinion in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Roger Fairfax looks at Nelson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Samuel Spital discusses Comcast v. [read post]