Search for: "US v. Perry"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
And then there's Governor Perry. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
Justice Barrett used a similar locution in Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:31 am
(My article on Cooper v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:17 am
— Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, at oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
They were some of the same arguments resoundingly rejected by a number of courts examining the various justifications for the same-sex marriage prohibitions — most notably the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts and California Federal District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
The issues in the case, Perry v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Wash. 2009); Perry v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See James Lee Clark v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I removed it so the rest of us could get through it, you understand. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Thus, even without the contractual protection of tenure and apart from considerations of academic freedom, a university may not choose to deny a job to a professor based on political disagreements, as the Supreme Court ruled in the 1972 case of Perry v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Abstract The use of humour by judicial officers is subject to formal and informal regulation. [read post]
