Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1501 - 1520 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
You get more 5-4 decisions in the United States Supreme Court than 4-3 decisions in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
Although the specific question raised in Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:47 am by Jeff Welty
It now includes a discussion of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Navarette v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:43 am
  Legal ethics speclialists may recall Standing Committee on Discipline in the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 19, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in e.Digital Corporation v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 9:18 am
Ninth Circuit blog points to United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm by Bona Law PC
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm by Bona Law PC
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
The judgment below is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety." [read post]