Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 1501 - 1520 of 16,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
That crime consists of an agreement to oppose by force the authority of the United States or to hinder the execution of federal law. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm by Josh Blackman
The majority opinion by Judge Jones followed precedent governing the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and held that the foreign corporation was not "at home" in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:11 am by Katie Kedian
United States, and the other a Second Circuit opinion by Judge Learned Hand, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Richard Hunt
The Ninth Circuit, which covers federal courts in California, says “no. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
EPA (which, per Chief Judge Srinivasan, does not reach the merits because “EPA’s response letter is locally or regionally applicable,” meaning “that venue over Chevron’s challenge lies exclusively in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit”). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A three-judge panel for the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously with the Biden administration and the Ways and Means Committee, ruling against Trump’s arguments against the committee’s authority, his privacy concerns, and his claim that complying with the request would be unconstitutional. [read post]