Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1501 - 1520 of 9,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm by Sme
United States (U.S., June 21, 2018) (reversing 7th Circuit: Employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act: they are not “money remuneration. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:53 am
Izumi asserted that TI Express created the TONOSAMA mark and first sold branded candy in the United States on March 27, 2016. [read post]
Furthermore, Wreal identified two consumers purpotedly confused by Amazon’s mark (Wreal, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
Sanchez Valle, in which the Justices are considering whether Puerto Rico and the United States are separate sovereigns for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm by Molly Runkle
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am by Will Baude
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:00 pm by Cicely Wilson
Remanded.Read more: Top state court says woman who donated egg to female partner has parental rightsState v. [read post]