Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
We know that companies sometimes respond to the incentive to create forms consumers won't read because in Ting v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:47 am
Measure D restricted the urban expansion areas, and added new development requirements.In 2001, Ideal submitted an application to expand the storage operation to include an additional 30 areas of the same lot as the existing activity into additional vehicle storage. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:56 am
Taylor v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:32 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:58 am
She has said that she remembers when she was eight years old, her father came home from his job as a schoolteacher and told her about the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:29 pm
Additional Resources: One in five nursing home residents abused by other residents, June 13, 2016, By Lisa Rapaport, Reuters More Blog Entries: Maree v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
It tried to do so in the context of Supreme Court of Canada judgments in R. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am
Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
So, given these key elements of a successful nominative fair use defense, imagine my surprise each time I hear the ad -- from a Relevant Radio sponsor on AM 1330 in Minneapolis -- refraining from use of the two syllable Volvo brand name in the ad; instead, using precious airtime to read this cumbersome mouthful: "We Repair Automobiles From Sweden Starting With The Letter V," or something similar to that effect. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:44 am
In Adams v. 724 Franklin Ave. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Sprawling urban growth and significant pollution in some eastern areas are causing a simultaneous increase in demand and reduction in supply. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:53 am
Healy v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev., 717 F.2d 929, 931 (4th Cir. 1983) (quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
(Kansas City v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm
12 Podcast with Vernon Jordan, former president of the National Urban League and civil rights litigator (topic TBA) Feb. 15-19 Podcast: “The Unexpected Consequences of Brown v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm
The Court of Appeal distinguished Hilmi & Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd (2010) EWCA Civ 314, on the basis that it was about the precise statutory wording for notices under section 99(5) of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, and There is no equivalent in the Housing Act 2004 or the 2007 Order. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm
In Greene v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Canton v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:54 am
Particularly worrying (to landlords) was the decision in Philipps v Francis (discussed very clearly by J) which seemed to say that landlords ought to consult on pretty much everything that came their way. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
We have not seen studies or significant public data on this question, though there will be useful information in the study just published by Urban, et al.[1] Based on our own experience and discussion with other practitioners, we believe that it is rare for users to file counter-notices. [read post]
