Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
  That has already been made clear in the United States, where members of the Republican Party vowed to take countermeasures. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 Even though the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, people still get pulled over with little justification. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:54 pm by NARF
Parker (Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html People in Interest of M.M. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
EPA (Cultural Resources; Trust Relationship) United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Cato Supreme Court Review (PDF), earlier on Bond v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:28 am
Since the lake was a water of the United States, Coeur Alaska needed a permit to discharge the slurry. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
Richardson appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.[3] Continue reading [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by admin
Maritime Laws and Regulations: Lakes and Rivers In Kaiser Aetna v. the United States, the Supreme Court determined that a waterway is navigable if it is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, has navigable capacity, and connects to continuous interstate and/or international waterways. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
The Hopi Tribe filed suit against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims seeking damages to cover the cost of providing safe drinking water on the Hopi Reservation. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 8:47 am by Dennis Crouch
US, the patent at issue covers a urine containment bag and the patentee alleges that the “Piddle Pak with powder” bought and used by the US government infringes United States Patent No. 5,116,139. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
After reviewing prior Third Circuit precedent and analyzing relevant United States Supreme Court decisions on vessel status, the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit and concluded that the Grand Palais was not a vessel. [read post]