Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 1501 - 1520 of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2022, 8:24 am by Steve Lubet
Ron DeSantis, as well a session titled “The End of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Court is scheduled to release at least one opinion, as well as orders from the Justices’ private conference last Thursday. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Court hears argument in forfeiture, money laundering case Kaley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
As noted by Justice Perram in the Capic v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:46 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
When the Florida Supreme Court took on the case, justices noted that the 3rd DCA was alone among appellate courts in its interpretation of the Restatement of Torts in this situation. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
” Sidestepping the general question of extraterritorial interpretation, the court instead pointed to its 2013 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
The question before the court on Wednesday was whether the Supreme Court’s 1969 ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm by Shaw Drake
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Kate Fort
In a split 5-4 opinion by Justice Alito, with a strong dissent from Justice Sotomayor, the Court limited ICWA, but did not eliminate it. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm by Alan Ackerman
The court's decision, in an opinion by Justice Nathan Hecht, was unanimous. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:05 pm by Ronald Mann
The November argument session brought the justices back once again to the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of cases on the topic — Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Decision in Dames & Moore v Regan By a vote of 8-1, the Supreme Court held that the President acted within his authority. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:11 pm
The conservative justices had urged casting aside the well-established rule, created by Congress as interpreted by the Supreme Court in 1957, and replacing it with an English common law rule which would have assisted shipowners in avoiding liability for their negligence. [read post]