Search for: "v. " Results 1501 - 1520 of 493,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2024, 4:35 am by Donald Dinnie
  The leading case in South Africa,  more generous to claimants, is Concord Insurance Co Ltd v Oelofsen 1992 4 SA 669(A) Lowe v Certain Underwriters of Lloyds of London Lowe v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number ATCSI00100 [2024] FCA 858 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:16 am by Donald Dinnie
  https://www.financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2024/09/Lowe-v-Certain-Underwriters-at-Lloyds-of-London-Subscribing-to-Policy-Number-ATCSI00100-2024-FCA-858.pdf Lowe v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number ATCSI00100 [2024] FCA 858 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
9/2/1819: James Madison writes letter to Judge Spencer Roane criticizing McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 3:57 am by Donald Dinnie
  https://www.financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2024/09/Fairbank-Haven-v-Merkon-Constructions-2024-.pdf Fairbank Haven Pty Ltd v Merkon Constructions Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 32 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
European Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement, Olivér Várhelyi, said the signature “lays an important foundation for Serbia’s deepened integration into EU’s green technology supply chains, supporting the key objectives of the EU’s New Growth Plan for the Western Balkans”. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 3:00 am by Kriyanka Reddi
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Bisschoff N.O. obo Reyners 2024 ZAWCHC 207 [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:29 am by Izak Lessing and Olivia Radford
The Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Kinros Estates (Pty) Ltd and Another The full judgement can be accessed at https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECMKHC/2024/84.html [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:20 am by Mark Summerfield
  As a result, Burley J found all of the remaining claims to be unpatentable under the plurality’s two step test: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (No 3) [2024] FCA 212. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 5:03 pm by lennyesq
The need to consider the value of the book as a whole, or its literary, scientific or political value, is part of the obscenity test outlined in the 1973 US Supreme Court case Miller v California. [read post]