Search for: "BOUNDS V. STATE" Results 1521 - 1540 of 10,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The panel concluded that it was bound by prior decisions from the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
In this chapter, the ICO states that it may issue additional guidance on: optional supplementary clauses (to address risks identified in the transfer risk assessment); optional commercial clauses; a template for introducing changes to the IDTA; a multi-party IDTA; and an example of a completed transfer risk assessment and IDTA. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This was a real concern at the time because the CRA was adopted in 1996, before United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Letkeman was duty bound to try to stop the Jeep as he suspected the driver was impaired and was thus a potential risk to others. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Article VI, § 1 of the 1846 state constitution simply states that "The assembly shall have the power of impeachment, by the vote of the majority of all the members elected. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:01 pm by Bonnie Frost
The starting point is that a court will be bound to enforce the terms of an agreement and will not second guess parental decision-making. [read post]