Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 10,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Letkeman was duty bound to try to stop the Jeep as he suspected the driver was impaired and was thus a potential risk to others. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Article VI, § 1 of the 1846 state constitution simply states that "The assembly shall have the power of impeachment, by the vote of the majority of all the members elected. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:01 pm by Bonnie Frost
The starting point is that a court will be bound to enforce the terms of an agreement and will not second guess parental decision-making. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
York argued that it was not bound by the tariff because it had not agreed to its terms and counter-claimed that any copying at issue was in any event covered by fair dealing. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:39 am by John Jascob
While the plaintiffs on appeal selectively cited outlying fees as proof of unreasonableness, they wrongly assumed that high fees are inherently disproportionate, the panel stated. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
  Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am by Florian Mueller
Haier is not a proper application of EU case law, the standard of review for staying an injunction in Germany is that there must be clear reversible error, and following the nation's highest court (with respect to almost every patent case, as it's very rare that any issues reach the Federal Constitutional Court) can't constitute a clear error.Without stating on a totally definitive basis that she recognizes Sisvel v. [read post]