Search for: "Brown v. State Bar" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Perry, 16 F.3d 688, 690 (6th Cir.1994) (“The standing requirement * * * may bar an appeal even though a litigant had standing before the district court. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
Mars v Hershey - Candy bar giant Mars Inc is suing Hershey for copyright and trade dress infringement over commercials for Hershey's Bliss chocolate that Mars allege copied its 2008 Dove TV ads. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 12:41 pm by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Texting a Person While They’re Driving Could Land You in Jail, May 3, 2016, By Jennings Brown, Vocativ More Blog Entries: Maines v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Part of the problem, no doubt is that confusing decision of the Supreme Court in Philip Morris v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
It was also denied as to the claim that it violated a state personnel records law by refusing to produce all of the employee’s medical and other records (Brown v Bank of America, NA). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]