Search for: "Bush v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Buckeye Institute announces that it has “filed the first significant First Amendment labor-law challenge in the Supreme Court of the United States since the landmark June 27 decision in Janus v. [read post]
The plaintiffs argue that this creates a separate tier for how votes are scrutinized in Clark County and the rest of Nevada counties and cite the highly controversial Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:12 am
Bush giving the Guantanamo detainees a constitutional right to pursue habeas challenges to their captivity. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:51 am
New Hampshire and Vermont are also among eight states that have filed a similar lawsuit against American Electric Power, which could be affected by Monday's ruling.Re a second important decision today, Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
In my latest FindLaw column, I pile on the Obama Justice Department for its wretched brief in Smelt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush, in which the Supreme Court ruled that “detainees who were brought [to Guantanamo Bay] involuntarily were entitled under the Constitution to seek habeas corpus relief because ‘[i]n every practical sense Guantanamo is not abroad; it is within the constant jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 pm by John Elwood
United States (especially pp. 26–27 n.5) and its opp. in Franklin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
"Last term saw the Court eroding the rights defendants have under habeas corpus, and for the first time since Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
  In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
In a surprising development, less than a week after last Tuesday’s oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
" The Brennan Center, which coordinated the amicus briefs, calls the case the most important voting case since Bush v. [read post]