Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
-centric  content--English-language analysis of American professional and collegiate sports--supports the  notion that the SBR website’s ‘intended audience’ was United States consumers. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:20 am
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 I am thrilled to report that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (which sits right here in Philadelphia) has just decided against American Express (AmEx) and in favor of consumers like you with regard to the “fine print” that American Express included with their Blue Cash card. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm by admin
(b) The proceeds of any sale, to the amount of the exemption existing at the time of sale, is exempt from levy, execution, or other process for one year after the receipt of the proceeds by the person entitled to the exemption. (6) The sale and disposition of one homestead does not prevent the selection or purchase of another. (7) For purposes of any claim or action for taxes brought by the United States Internal Revenue Service, a homestead exemption claimed on real property in… [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:25 am by Sam Brunson
Reams, Inc., Internal Revenue Acts of the United States: The Revenue Act of 1954 with Legislative Histories and Congressional Documents at 1574-78.) [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(GLC), a small investment banking firm that provides strategic advice and private capital raising services to businesses, financial sponsors and management teams throughout the United States. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
  When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MORSON, Plaintiff, -against KREINDLER & KREINDLER, LLP, Defendant.09 CV 2994 (DRH)(ARL)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
Under the Howey Test, a transaction will be determined to be an investment contract, and therefore a security if: It is an investment of money; There is an expectation of profits from the investment; The investment of money is a common enterprise; and The profit is derived from the effort of a promoter or third party Later cases expanded the investment of “money” to include assets other than cash (see Uselton v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
Many disputes in closely-held companies feature one outspoken owner feuding with a united group of the remaining owners over management or participation in the company. [read post]