Search for: "Case & Associates Properties IncĀ " Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 4:29 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
  In August, 2010 DePuy acknowledged the serious problems associated with their products and initiated a recall of the product. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court in cases like Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
” The American Council for the Preservation of Cultural Property (ACPCP) objected that the AML Act became law “without there ever having been a single documented criminal case in the United States or Europe of antiquities being used as an asset with which to launder ill-gotten funds. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Recently, I had the opportunity to speak at the American Intellectual Property Law Association's annual Trade Secrets Summit. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Matter of Giaimo (EGA Associates, Inc.), 31 Misc 3d 1217(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 50714(U) (Sup Ct NY County Apr. 25, 2011), a valuation proceeding involving a large portfolio of Manhattan apartment buildings, where the court applied a discount for built-in capital gains but refused to apply a marketability discount. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Matter of Giaimo (EGA Associates, Inc.), 31 Misc 3d 1217(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 50714(U) (Sup Ct NY County Apr. 25, 2011), a valuation proceeding involving a large portfolio of Manhattan apartment buildings, where the court applied a discount for built-in capital gains but refused to apply a marketability discount. [read post]