Search for: "Christians v. Christians" Results 1521 - 1540 of 5,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 30546, Feb. 9, 2015) and dismissed the complaint of an inmate whose faith was black magic Voodoo that when Christian preachers from the community periodically visited the jail, they would conduct worship services and play recordings of Christian music in the prisoner pod, and his complaint that the chaplain refused to put books about death on the book cart.In Hulbert v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court in May agreed to decide, at its next Term, the case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
But the district court's holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 1:09 am
" "You cannot believe that abortion should not be allowed for mental health reasons and support Roe v Wade," O'Steen said. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:03 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Conceptualizing Yahoo v L.C.R.A.: Private Law, Constitutional Review and International Conflict of Laws Ariel L. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:42 am by gmlevine
The threshold test is simply “comparing the disputed domain name with the mark relied upon, both visually and phonetically, and by comparing the respective meanings which each conveys,” RapidShare AG, Christian Schmid v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 110921 (D CO, Aug. 20, 2015), a Colorado federal district court denied injunctive relief to an inmate who complained that he was not permitted to observe the holy days and diet of his Biblical Christian faith.In Shabazz v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 1:22 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 195849 (ND MS, Nov. 16, 2018), a Mississippi federal magistrate judge concluded that restricting an inmate's access to a Christian pastor when the inmate was not a Christian did not interfere with his free exercise rights.In Richard v. [read post]