Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm by Victoria Gallegos
  Cornell Overfield explained extended continental shelves claims in the Arctic. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
Louis), "students with diabetes" (University of South Florida), "one course at a time" (Cornell College), "touched by a nurse" (University of Colorado), "we’re conquering cancer" (University of Texas), "working toward a world without cancer" (University of Kansas Hospital), and "imagination beyond measure" (University of Virginia) -- the author comments:"Registrations and rights-claiming of this sort are unwarranted in higher education. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:44 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
For example, work by Dave Schwarz and Chris Seaman with mock juries suggests that the standard of proof for patent invalidity matters, and also that Microsoft-v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:12 am by Jon L. Gelman
The trend may continue to consider student-athletes as employees and allow them access to workers' compensation benefits.Ralph Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman analyzes yesterday’s argument in Shular v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
Blume of Cornell Law School will argue for respondent William Weaver. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am by PaulKostro
Cornell Univ., No. 09-3601, 2009 WL 2176626, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Simon Bord and Katherine Thibodeau have Cornell’s preview. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
” Meanwhile, an op-ed by Saul Cornell in the Christian Science Monitor makes the case for an elitist Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Shelby Garland and Larry Blocho have Cornell’s preview, and Subscript’s graphic explainer is here. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Government Whistleblowers; Implications of Garcetti v. [read post]