Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1521 - 1540 of 48,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2024, 4:05 am by Donald Dinnie
  The net effect of all this was that a claim to repair property insured was subject to a per loss deductible of £10,000, but a claim for the cost of repairing property damaged by a design defect was £10,000, but a claim for the cost of repairing property damaged by a design defect was £150,000 any one event. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm by Amy Howe
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:37 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
Subchapter V Another option for small business owners is to file under Subchapter V. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Fung created a trust fund administered by his attorney to pay real estate taxes and any other ongoing costs associated with his property ownership. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[18] Given the zero cost to procure short reports, plaintiff class action litigators are incentivized to rely on them as evidence “to recover the losses investors suffer due to [alleged] corporate misconduct,” according to the “Activist Short-Sellers Are The Dark Knights Of Wall Street” authors, even if such work product is curated to inflict maximum impact on the stock price.[19] According to a Bloomberg reporter, “[a]ctivist short sellers such as… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
” In that regard, the guidelines note, e.g., switching costs and search frictions that, of course, may be high or low and may impose costs on employers as well as employees. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:55 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The cost is a mere $40 for Section members and $50 for non-members (lower for government, non-profit and in-house employees). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:02 am by Dennis Crouch
The court relies on Mexicali Rose v. [read post]