Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Article 414 further states that: “The State shall adopt adequate and cross-cutting measures for the mitigation of climate change, by limiting greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and air pollution; it shall take measures for the conservation of the forests and vegetation; and it shall protect the population at risk. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Aaron R. Cooper
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
Because I wanted to see cases from the 4/1 (San Diego), and yet this opinion clearly states right on the caption that it's from Orange County. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am by Phil Dixon
Post-conviction non-profit lacked standing to assert First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s law surrounding disclosure of execution protocols Justice 360 v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm by Hadley Baker, Claudia Swain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on content moderation in NetChoice v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
That's the day on which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the parties' cross-appeal in San Francisco. [read post]
Due to the cross-border dimension of cybersecurity incidents, the CRA applies to any PDEs that are placed on the EU market—regardless of where they are manufactured—and imposes new mandatory conformity assessment requirements. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
If abortion is banned in State A, but legal in neighboring State B, that creates an incentive for residents of A to cross into B in order to get abortions - even if the feds enact a ban on such crossing. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]