Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 9:22 am by Kiera Flynn
“Class Action Litigation After Dukes v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
  Here are some panels that may be of interest to readers:YOUNGBLOOD: YOUTH, RACE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS PRESIDING: Prudence Cumberbatch, Brooklyn College The Racial and Sexual Politics of Space: Youth and Interracial Mixing in New Orleans, Lakisha Michelle Simmons, Davidson College  More than a Hamburger and a Cup of Coffee: NAACP Youth and the Black Freedom Movement, Thomas Bynum, Middle Tennessee State University  Blackboard Jungle: Desegregation,… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolIt has been a slightly over a month now since the United States Supreme Court announced its blockbuster decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  Meanwhile, here in the United States, foreign issuers continue to be sued despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
The Court recently addressed this same concern in Dukes v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, Dukes might not have been as damaging to multi-jurisdictional class actions as the Court’s other recent opinion in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The concept of judicial review of the constitutionality of state and federal statutes by the Supreme Court is generally rested upon the epic decision in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
If you Google Too Big to Sue, you will get a bunch of stories about Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Kiera Flynn
This week a Michigan state court relied on this Term’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Max Kennerly
In the big picture, although class actions were intended to permit many disparate plaintiffs with similar claims to aggregate their claims against defendants, courts now, particularly after the Dukes v. [read post]