Search for: "Dean v. Dean" Results 1521 - 1540 of 3,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
10:30 Welcoming Remarks by Dean Minow 10:33 Alex Smith- symposium coordinator thanking everyone who put work into today. 10:35- room is almost full, so great to see so many people showing support! [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
By Dean Cazenave, Blane Clark and Elisabeth Prescott Keenly aware of the enormous impact COVID-19 is having on small businesses throughout the country, in response, the Congress approved and on March 27, 2020, the President signed the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” (the “CARES Act”). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Although Mary may have had a contingent claim against Dean's estate, the Indiana Code required her to file that claim within three months of the published notice of Dean's death. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S., 08-192),  and whether a federal law imposing an enhanced sentence for firing a gun during a drug crime or other violent crime applies if the gun was fired accidentally or involuntarily (Dean v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:48 pm
That's not an undesirable outcome.And:The Associated Press reported that a June 17 execution date had been set for Charles Dean Hood, who was convicted of a double murder in Plano, and that Larry Donnell Davis was scheduled to die July 31 for a 1995 robbery-murder in Amarillo. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:50 pm
In today's Chicago Tribune, Robert Manor and Rick Popely have this article on the implications of the Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]