Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 8,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
A July 2015 appellate court decision, State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
S. 96 (1944), the Court stated that “the exercise of due diligence does not relieve the owner of his obligation” to provide a seaworthy ship and, in the same ruling, held that the fellow-servant doctrine did not provide a defense. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:31 am
Death of parent having custody; reversion of custody to surviving parent; appointment of guardian by superior court; removalIn case of the death of the parent to whom the care and custody of the minor children shall have been awarded by the Superior Court, or in the case of the death of the parent in whose custody the children actually are, when the parents have been living separate and no award as to the custody of such children has been made, the care and… [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:03 am
Huber v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:46 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1023 (2012). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
The Worcester Superior Court's decision earlier this year in Goodman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision on an application in York University v. [read post]
District Court's Personal Jurisdiction Opinion Demonstrates the Confusion That Remains Post-Nicastro
27 Oct 2011, 6:22 am
Superior Ct., 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:20 am
The post Does the D.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Smith does not claim a cognizable injury under Rodearmel. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:08 am
Utility Consumers’ Action Network v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
Crest v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 2:08 pm
” The Court therefore reversed and remanded the Superior Court ruling, sending the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am
Superior Court, which had held that most class action waivers in employment agreements are unconscionable. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:06 am
To give effect to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Hryniak v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:44 am
In an important decision - Dome Telecom v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:44 am
In an important decision - Dome Telecom v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm
" All that this holding does is give a party the opportunity to argue the matter to the lower court -- a court that now knows which way the wind blows because the Court of Appeal has expressly told 'em. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:53 am
Superior Court, which was ultimately codified into law by California’s AB-5 and revised by AB-2257. [read post]
