Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 9:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) 5.30% 31 0.35% 5.65% 41 0.70% Wash. 6.50% 9 2.67% 9.17% 4 3.90% W.Va. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
BACKGROUNDThe facts recited in this opinion are the court's findings based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at a one-day trial held on October 1, 2018. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:25 am by Bob Ambrogi
The E3\G3 includes many eDiscovery features, but does not include the advanced capabilities contained within E5/G5. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Then benchers could perform as does a government’s Cabinet ministers, and no longer have to be its civil service as well. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:38 am by Larry
As noted in the ICCS decision, UL does not agree to retroactive licenses. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
It says Amendment 41 does not apply to “home rule cities or counties that have adopted charters, ordinance or resolutions that address the matters covered” under the amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Howard Knopf
This could be done by inserting a new section 41.1(5) (based upon current numbering) along the following lines:For greater certainty, it is deemed always to have been the law that s. 41.1(1) does not apply to any acts permitted by sections 29, 29.1 and 29.2.[4]      6. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Texwinca states that it does not have a controlling influence over Megawell, and that it has no responsibility for the working conditions at the factories in Vietnam. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
41 California privacy lawyers, professionals, and professors are urging the California legislature to make major changes to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which the legislature hastily passed in 2018. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:45 pm by Sami Azhari
§2252A(b)(1) Mailing, transporting, or receiving, or possession with intent to sell child pornography (second or subsequent sex based offense) 15 years 40 years 22 (41-51 months) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
With its letter of 13 May 2016, the appellant filed a new main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:56 am by Teresa Walrod
” 2019 01 10 order denying stay UPDATE (Background materials): 1 complaint 15 motion to dismiss count ii 18 response 19 reply 23 dct order granting 15 28 george motion for summary judgment 32 response 34 reply 40 us motion to stay 41 amended motion [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by Adam Feldman
Coming next, with a much more modest 41 cites to the lower-court opinion, is Biestek v. [read post]