Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 1521 - 1540 of 37,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2014, 1:00 pm by WIMS
Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Rob Portman (R-OH) and Mike Lee (R-UT) called on the Department of the Interior (DOI) nominee Janice Schneider to commit to ensuring that the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) does not "rig" job loss estimates associated with OSM's proposed stream rule. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Replies to the appeal of the patent proprietors were submitted by opponents 2, 3, 5 to 8, 10, 13 and 14 (hereinafter: respondents 2, 3, 5 to 8, 10, 13 and 14).By letter of 4 November 2016, opponent 4 withdrew its opposition.VII. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 2:38 pm by John W. Arden
Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled (In re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation, April 10, 2013, Bea, C.). [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:24 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The determination as to whether a party is a necessary party would be as per the provisions contained in Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.(4) The second proviso to Section 8 would state that the judicial authority will not refer the matter to arbitration if it finds that the arbitration agreement does not exist or is null and void. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:59 pm by Gene Takagi
I’ll be on Nonprofit Radio this Friday at 10:30 am PT / 1:30 pm ET discussing the new overtime rules and their impact on nonprofits with host Tony Martignetti. [read post]
4 May 2008, 5:56 am
When Hillary Clinton appeared on Nightline this week, Cynthia McFadden asked her (from the transcript, ABC News, May 1, 2008, Clinton on the Rise, available on Lexis.com): Would you be running for president if Chelsea were 10? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:55 am by shmedia
Previously  capped off at $75,000, $100,000 or $175,000 the homestead exemption will increase as  of January 1, 2021. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:13 pm by PaulKostro
Emancipation does not occur automatically by reason of the dependent child reaching the age of majority, now eighteen, [1] and in fact, “need not occur at any particular age[;]” however, the fact that a child reaches the age of majority establishes “prima facie, but not conclusive, proof of emancipation. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 6:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The flood of withdrawals “destroyed the bank’s finances”; at the close of business on Thursday, the bank, according to the Journal, had a negative cash balance of nearly $1 billion. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
If the article you are searching does not appear go to the top of the screen and click on Law.Com Newswire and scroll down to the appropriate article: Suit Accuses Tobacco Firms of Targeting Black Consumers, Seeks $1 Billion in DamagesBingham McCutchen Offers Buyouts to Some AssociatesDespite Docket Drop, Justices Face Packed HomestretchEx-Judge Gets 3 to 10 Years for Bribery, Taking FavorsCarlton Fields Loses IP Team to Woodcock Washburn3rd Circuit: Employers May… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:04 am
Walker's] sentence . . . violate[d] the Fifth and Eighth Amendments. op. at *1. [read post]