Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 10:58 am
The ratio is even more extreme for the top 1 percent of households. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
” Accordingly, the circumstance that the appellant was absent from his usual residence between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2008 because he was then working in Aveiro, in the North of Portugal, does not play any relevant role in the present case. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:26 am
’ (In re Marriage of Arceneaux (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1130, 1133].) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:06 am
That power is plenary and may be exerted to protect interstate commerce 'no matter what the source of the dangers which threaten it.' Second Employers' Liability Cases, 223 U.S. 1 , at page 51, 32 S.Ct. 169, 176, 38 L.R.A.( N.S.) 44. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
[vi] 17 N&CR p. 33 [vii] 25 No. 10 N&CR p. 51. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
§ 4.188(b)(1) places the burden on the contractor of showing no evidence of prior violations. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:53 am
California Food Service Workers Supplemental Paid Sick Leave – Executive Order N-51-20 On April 16, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-51-20, which provides new paid sick leave to certain food service workers. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:30 pm
Specifically, it doesn’t address any of the following questions: 1. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Code § 1491(a)(1) (2006). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
The wording of the claims is not relevant for the present decision and is not reproduced here.Reasons for the DecisionPriority right (Article 87(1) EPC)1. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:47 am
In a 2010 blog post, Grits summarized the results thusly:According to that survey, of persons with suspended licenses whose annual income was under $30,000: (1) 64% were unable to maintain their prior employment following a license suspension; (2) only 51% of persons who lost their job following a license suspension were able to find a new employment; (3) 66% reported that their license suspension negatively affected their job performance; and (4) 90% of persons whose license was… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 7:30 pm
This, of course, is the central question raised by my widely unread book on The Federalist, most particularly by Federalist 1. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:38 pm
She wrote,[232] Jennifer’s evidence does not set out a plan for the litigation. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:52 am
According to the FCC’s 2016 Broadband Progress Report, 51 percent of households have access to only one high-speed broadband provider. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
§ 1324a(a)(1)(A), (a)(2), and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm
Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence (“more likely than not” or “51%” – the standard utilized in VOP merits hearings, for more see this post) that the touching occurred, that it constituted “violent” behavior, and thus, defendant is in violation of his probation. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
Even if one assumes that a descriptive meaning of the element 'world', as such, cannot be established, a further question remains: does the term 'greenworld' as a whole designate a characteristic of the products concerned and could it be used by competitors for such purposes in the future? [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:00 pm
By using a separate will for the closely held companies, there may be significant savings if the will does not need to be probated.The Application Judge’s decision and reasoning is succinctly summarized by Associate Chief Justice Marrocco:[1] John Douglas Milne and Sheilah Marlyn Milne died on the same day. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The important thing is that it does not refer to the outcome of the case, such as whether the patent is valid and whether it is infringed by a particular product.Res judicata is about the outcome of a case, and refers to the principle that, once a matter has been decided as between two parties in a decision that is final (ie not open to further appeal), neither party can re-litigate the same matter again. [read post]
