Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Thus, when it comes to taxing e-discovery as costs that the prevailing party can recover, we’re probably going to have lots more costs to tax than does the other side when they win. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Decision T 84/02 cited by the opponents and by the Board and decision T 73/88 are, therefore, contradictory, and, moreover, contrary to balance between the parties.The Board admits that the expression “by way of cross-appeal” does not fit very well into the procedural system of appeals under the EPC. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Penwith also made a grant of £750k to CTE drawn from its second homes council tax fund.Now this summary does little justice to the jejeune approach of the councils to the use of their formal powers. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Penwith also made a grant of £750k to CTE drawn from its second homes council tax fund.Now this summary does little justice to the jejeune approach of the councils to the use of their formal powers. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Thus, claim 1 as defined in any of the main and 1st to 3rd auxiliary requests does not prima facie overcome the existing objection of lack of novelty over [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
American Atheists (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-1276 Issue(s): (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state, and located on both private and public property properly… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
There will be one major exception though, wherein prior art does not include disclosures made by an applicant or obtained through the applicant 1 year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
., 549 F.3d 1381, 1387–88 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part II: Summary and Criticisms of the Advisory Panel’s Recommendations 1. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Rajoub, 11-88, each involves whether corporations can be sued for such claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
” But what does that mean? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
[6] Moreover, the description of the patent in suit does not provide any indication that another meaning could have been intended for the range of temperatures defined in claim 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
This document does not deal with calculating recirculation. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
Oppenheimer, 242 U.S. 85, 87-88 (1916) (Holmes, J.). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
No. 79-1 at 2-6.) [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:37 pm
., 952 F.2d 1384, 1387-88 (Fed. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
Some of the most important elements gleaned from these successful constitutions include an independent court before which one may appeal to the new constitution because such a constitution adequately secures the integrity of the court itself.The Japanese Constitution as Law and the Legitimacy of the Supreme Court's Constitutional Decisions: A Response to MatsuiCraig Martin Washington University Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 6, 2011 Abstract: This article, from a conference at the Washington… [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
This claim read:1. [read post]
