Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
California 1/1/15 FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 4:50 pm
The effort to cabin the case to California, as opposed to the other civil-union states is the most unsatisfying part of the decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
LEXIS 26293 (SD CA, Feb. 26, 2013), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that suspension of Protestant group prayer services, fellowship and ministry classes during the prison lock downs violated his rights under RLUIPA.In Toland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
Mississippi so many times before turning them down was that Justice Breyer was writing a dissent from denial of certiorari. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
., et al, v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected this argument, holding that the Federal Arbitration Act does not prevent California or other states from striking down class action waivers [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
What this case may come down to is what the phrase “lawfully made under this title” in §109(a) actually means. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
The government of California and a bunch of other states. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 am
The California Supreme Court issued a ruling stating that absent a warrant, the smell of marijuana alone is not sufficient evidence for police to conduct a search of personal property, such as a mailed package. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:00 am
Last week, I testified before the Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission on California State Government Organization and the Economy concerning Governor Jerry Brown’s 2012 Reorganization Plan. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
Initially, the trial court turned the employer down and this was again examined by a California Court of Appeal.Subsequently, the lengthy opinion was issued and a conclusion was drawn indicating that to force a disclosure of the names, a plaintiff must state a legally sufficient cause of action comprising of the following elements of that cause of action: (1) the courts determining these issues must ensure that reasonable efforts are made to notify the unknown… [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:29 am
In a recent California age discrimination lawsuit, the 49-year-old applicant claims he has been turned down because of his age. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am
Traveling Employee Injured in Fall Down Employer’s Unobstructed Stairs. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The court breezes past this careful item-specific review because the complaint is styled as a class action, but the court should have narrowed the case down by excluding the items that categorically qualify for Section 230. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm
Texas in 2003); and we have anti-miscegenation laws, struck down when 16 states still had them (Loving v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]
