Search for: "Fee v. United States"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
The general rule in the United States, known as the American Rule, is that each party only pays their own attorney’s fees, regardless of who wins. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
In June, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
The decision of the ECtHR in MGN v United Kingdom, which held that the AJA scheme was incompatible with article 10 of the Convention, concerned the balancing of the rights guaranteed by article 10 with article 6 rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
At oral argument, the petitioners, the respondent, and the United States all urged the Court to adopt the Gartenberg standard, even while quibbling over just what proper application of the standard would entail. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
No. 99–345, at 9 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266, 5274; see also United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
This morning Advocate General (AG) Campos Sanchez-Bordona addressed this very question by delivering his Opinion in United Video Properties, Inc v Telenet NV, C-57/15, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of Antwerp (Belgium) seeking clarification as to the correct interpretation of Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:04 am
The Washington Supreme Court decision yesterday, together with the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Townsend v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
A few weeks ago, I reported on six cases in which the Solicitor General has recently filed briefs expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:38 am
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A Subway customer filed a nationwide class action lawsuit in the federal district court in Chicago, alleging that Subway violated the consumer protection statutes of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, after measuring a “Footlong” sandwich purchased from Subway and realizing it was less than 11 inches long (Buren v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:00 pm
Lane v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
In MC Asset Recovery, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows: Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
§ 505, a court may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or its officers and may also award a reasonable attorneys’ fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
The trial court ruled against Gilman on his defamation suit and in Gilman v. [read post]
