Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL for Credit Union Services (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of LEG BALANCE for athletic apparel over FOOT BALANCE for leather footwear (TTABlog) TTAB reverses refusal to register Cartier Watch design, finding 2(f) evidence sufficient (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps G & F Licensing – Screwed but not a Federal problem: G & F Licensing Corp. v Field & Stream… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:17 am
More recently a United States Supreme Court case in 1995, McIntyre v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:23 pm
Hines v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm
The district court thus properly granted the Firm’s motion for partial summary judgment.Affirmed.J. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:27 pm
” The case cite is Radiator Express Warehouse, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm
It is likely that these meetings were in response to the recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
" Ricciardello v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Foot Locker Retail, Inc., 168 Cal. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:41 am
In Newing v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
The relationship between the parties must be ascertained on the footing that the tenant was in occupation and was paying a weekly rent. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
The relationship between the parties must be ascertained on the footing that the tenant was in occupation and was paying a weekly rent. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:07 pm
Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:49 am
In Hines v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm
Delaware Chancellor Allen's decision in Mendel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
In two recent but separate developments, homosexuals fleeing persecution have been granted a lower threshold for refugee status and the Strasbourg Court has rejected a complaint by a same sex couple that Austria was in violation of the Convention for not granting them the right to marry. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
" Alexander Milburn Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
Cesare v. [read post]
