Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 37,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
In IRAP v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
(Ilya Somin) The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that several Asian-American groups have filed an amicus brief opposing the University of Texas’ affirmative action program, which is being challenged in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
It's also consistent with the Landrian v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:41 am
(NASAA) joined forces to file an Amicus Brief in the United States Supreme Court in Janus Capital Group, et al v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
Upset by the state constitutional amendment, a group took the issue to federal court to challenge the constitutionality of Proposition 8 and won on August 4, 2010 (See Perry v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:44 am
May 17th, 2014 marked the 60th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:55 am
[citing Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
DMCA safe harbor provision applies to copyright infringement claims brought under state common law — UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm
The rule of law, as observed in Roncarelli v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The Delhi High Court has read down s. 377 to exclude consensual sex between adults in private in its judgment in Naz Foundation v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm
Florida courts allow probe of finances of MDs who treat many injury plaintiffs [Dolman Law Group; Crable v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In East West Bank v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Here's our Introduction: The Second Circuit's opinion below gives state officials free rein to financially blacklist their political opponents—from gun-rights groups, to abortion-rights groups, to environmentalist groups, and beyond. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 12:41 pm
As stated by the Appeals Court, NN's main argument against the prior decision is that "unless a statute requires exhaustion, judicial review of agency action under the APA, applicable where no other statutory channel of review is provided, does not require exhaustion unless there is both internal agency review available and the final agency action is rendered inoperative during such review. [read post]
