Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm
Following the European Court of Justice decision earlier this year in Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González, Google has had a flood of requests to have webpages deleted from their index. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:41 am
So Max Mosley has done a deal with Google in respect of his claim that Google had breached his rights under the DPA 1998 by refusing to block certain images and videos accessible via the Google search engine (see this FT article which suggests that the settlement also applies to claims brought by Mr Mosley in Germany and France). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:39 am
Cal.), and Huawei v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
Highlights this week included: Apple wins (again) in Germany: Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction upheld (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) (Class 99) “It was a dumb idea”: newspaper chain fires copyright troll Righthaven (ArsTechnica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) CAFC holds internet monetization method is patent-eligible: Ultramercial v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
Finally, the plaintiff was dismissed and he sued for unfair dismissal in Germany. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Injunction against, inter alia, installing time bomb on computers , RELIABLE v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am
The U.S. is stuck in a standoff with Germany over whether to send tanks to Ukraine ahead of a meeting of Western Defense leaders in Germany today. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm
Contrary to the case of Breyer v Germany of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Human Rights does not focus on delineating the notion of personal data with regard to dynamic IP addresses and on establishing the criteria based on which a dynamic IP address may qualify as personal data. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Ortovox v Mammut The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am
Germany is for instance party to approx. 140 IIAs. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
Infosint (IPKat) (PatLit) Clobex (Clobetasol) – US: Galderma, Dermalogix agree to end Clobex suit with Paddock (Patent Docs) Crestor (Rosuvastatin) – US: Palmetto files patent infringement suit against AstraZeneca based on its Crestor product; AstraZeneca files for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity (Patent Docs) Drospirenone, Ethinylestradiol – UK: Shedding further light on obviousness: Gedeon Richter PC v Bayer Schering Pharma AG (Kluwer Patent Blog)… [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:39 am
: Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Shawn Turner at Hotel News Now previews RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Ahcom, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
The Court has to consider the criteria for balancing these rights set out in Von Hannover (No 2) v Germany (2012) 55 EHRR 15 [109] to [113] The fact that Ms Rubio was a well-known public figure as a singer did not mean that her activities or conduct in her private life should be regarded as necessarily falling within the public interest. [read post]
