Search for: "Grays v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
’ (PatLit) PCC Update 1: new regime, new judge, old case, old rules: Technical Fibre Products Ltd & Anor v Bell & Ors (PatLit) Formula 1 fight for right to race as Nelumbo Nucifera (IPKat) Summary judgment, but no quick fix on costs: Patents County Court decision in Nike International Ltd & Ors v Bateman (IP finance) United States US Patents USPTO announces launch of second peer to patent pilot program (Inovia IP) (IP Watch) (IP: KCE) (Patently-O)… [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Possible Regulatory Developments at the SEC – Advisers to Private Funds As compared to Chair Gensler’s tenure, and in light of the Fifth Circuit’s decision in National Association of Private Fund Managers et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm by Guest Author
States that have adopted the Advanced Clean Trucks and Omnibus rules, in particular, are already seeing shortages, particularly in the heavy-duty diesel market. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
And then the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]