Search for: "HALL v. HALL" Results 1521 - 1540 of 6,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Dupont Circle Citizens Assoc. v District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 2018 WL 1748313 (DC App 4/12/2018) [read post]
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Second Circuit, finds for the plaintiff, a police officer who was retaliated against for speaking on matters of public concern in his capacity as a union representative.The case is Montero v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Alex (Challenging Breathalyzer Results) with Kyla Lee R v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:10 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS QC, MATRIX
 As with the earlier case of Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 73 this case will be an important judgment in this contentious area of religious belief and public service. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Matthew D. Lee
On May 30, the newly-formed Philadelphia Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s Section on Taxation will host a meet-and-greet event with the Honorable Mark V. [read post]
4 May 2018, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
But last week, the Delaware Chancery Court allowed plaintiffs to continue with their shareholder derivative claims against the board of CBS Corporation in Feuer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 02051-18 A woman v That’s Life – Resolved via IPSO mediation involving Principles 1 (Accuracy), 2 (Privacy), 7 (Children in sex cases) and 11 (Victims of sexual assault) 18693-17 Ward v Mail on Sunday – no breach of Principle 1 (Accuracy) after… [read post]