Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 1521 - 1540 of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Ray Dowd
  You haven't heard his name before and no one in the United States has even cared enough to make a Wikipedia page for him in English, even though our museums are full of works that passed through his hands. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Wegner also writes --In other words, if S. 1145 is enacted in the manner hoped for by the PTO, then S. 1145 would legislatively overrule today's Tafas v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Whereas certain passages of Lord Hope’s judgment in BA (Nigeria) – namely paras 29, 30, 31 and 33 – did lend support to the view that the new scheme introduced by the 2002 Act rendered the reasoning in Onibiyo and rule 353 redundant, Lord Lloyd-Jones found “major difficulties inherent in this reading” of that authority. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm by Michelle Yeary
  So, there is also no question that plaintiff’s state law claims are preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
A confluence of demands for civil rights gives me hope that the United States will move to brighter times with less violence toward the vulnerable. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:01 am by Liisa Speaker
Supreme Court’s ruling in Hope v Pelzer, 536 US 730 (2002), for the proposition that officials must be on notice that their alleged conduct was unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:59 pm
  Tony Mauro in this post provides the story: In a brief order on today's order list the Supreme Court dashed the hopes of gun rights advocates who hoped to have two lawyers and additional time arguing their cause before the Supreme Court when it hears arguments in the historic case D.C. v. [read post]