Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Tysiac v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Tysiac v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 1:34 pm
For some time now Scotch Irish has been brewing a companion ale, Corporal Punishment, a bitter brown ale that I also quite like. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:39 pm
Action Apartment Association v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
Marmazov, Pavlo V. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
The mostly poor, mostly Scots-Irish “crackers” who spilled into the Panhandle had no patience for government. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
"Daithi is of course, Irish and thus inherently pro-potatoes. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
The Darklight Film Festival is hosting what should be a very interesting symposium on Privacy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
