Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 1521 - 1540 of 10,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm by LTA-Editor
That Act requires one of two things to afford a musical work protection: (1) that the work was published with the proper notice, or (2) that a copy of the composition was deposited with the register. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
ShareChief Justice John Roberts began his 2021 year-end report, as he so often does, with an anecdote from history to set the stage. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm by WIMS
The report examines the key attributes, challenges, and costs of the Yucca Mountain repository and the two principal alternatives to a repository that nuclear waste management experts identified: (1) storing the nuclear waste at two centralized locations; and, (2) continuing to store the waste on site where it was generated. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:35 pm
Relevant factor to make that determination include whether the individual (1) had the authority to hire and fire workers; (2) supervised the employee's work; (3) made decisions about employee compensation; or (4) maintained employment records. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:18 am
The USPTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark ARTIZEN, in standard character and stylized form, finding it to be merely descriptive of essential oils and related products. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:05 am
The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark QONSENT (in standard character form) for consent management services, deeming the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:03 am
Finding that the term #MAGICNUMBER108 fails to function as a trademark for shirts, the TTAB affirmed a refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by David DePaolo
Rule 35(e) required in such circumstances the employee to return to the same QME to the extent possible.The WCAB said there's nothing in the statutes that could be interpreted to mandate a single QME evaluator -"Based upon our review of the relevant statutes and case law we hold that:(1) The Labor Code does not require an employee to return to the same panel QME for an evaluation of a subsequent claim of injury. (2) The requirement in Rule 35.5(e) that an employee return… [read post]