Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 4:15 am
Finally the court dismissed claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, holding in part:Plaintiffs suggest that Defendants are nonetheless liable because Defendants drafted the Trust documents that made Jeffs’ revelations guiding tenets in how the Trust was managed. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:13 am
Accordingly, if the owner gave permission to a family member to drive the vehicle, gave control to the driver, the family member was in the vehicle, and the vehicle was engaged in a family purpose—then the defendant could be held vicariously liable if the defendant had the right to exercise authority and control and an agency relationship existed between the defendant and the family member. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:44 am
The Facts of the Case The plaintiff worked for a maintenance company that was contracted by the defendant casino to clean the casino’s air ducts. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:27 am
In the end, the court determined that because the officer’s actions did not rise to the level of “reckless disregard,” the defendants were entitled to immunity. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:47 pm
The defendant, Ralph’s, brought a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (so-called “JNOV”). [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:03 am
The trial court found that Acuity did not have a duty to defend. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
In these cases, Recology may be liable for their employee’s negligence under the theory of vicarious liability. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:50 am
They filed suit against the defendants, the employer (and several of its affiliates) of the driver who was at fault in the accident, alleging that the defendants were liable for the wrongful death and personal injuries that occurred in the accident. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:05 am
This case serves as a warning to employers that they may be liable for violation of the ADA based on vague and overbroad language in their medical examination inquiries. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
After a trial, the jury found the defendants not liable for the plaintiff’s death. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:21 am
Let’s see more in detail how the Rome court reasoned. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:12 am
In this week’s case (ICBC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The Second Circuit’s decision, however, is unlikely to settle the question as to whether corporations may be held liable under the ATS. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Defendant American Real Estate Holdings, LP (American), an out-of-possession owner, leased the building where plaintiff's accident occurred to defendant Levitz Furniture Corporation of Queens (Levitz). [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 11:39 am
The panel reaffirmed that the “law of this Circuit” is that corporations may not be held liable under the ATS. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
§ 95.11(3)(c), but only against the General Contractor and/or Architect (“Direct Defendants”), leaving the Direct Defendants, who may be only vicariously liable, to defend a claims for a multitude of defects while pursuing the actively negligent parties as third party defendants. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
§ 95.11(3)(c), but only against the General Contractor and/or Architect (“Direct Defendants”), leaving the Direct Defendants, who may be only vicariously liable, to defend a claims for a multitude of defects while pursuing the actively negligent parties as third party defendants. [read post]
