Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 13,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 9:22 am
Specifically, we told the court that when facial recognition is secretly used on people later charged with a crime, those people have a right to obtain information about how the error-prone technology functions and whether it produced other matches.EFF, ACLU, Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology, and Innocence Project filed an amicus brief in support of the defendant’s petition for review in Willie Allen Lynch v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
--Righthaven v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
The court then distinguished Harrelson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:15 pm
That's a fine line, and smart people could (and would) argue about whether that line was crossed here.But the line was at least approached. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:34 am
People are people. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
It would put a chill in the hearts of people who may have fudged financial numbers a bit in order to qualify for a loan or a line of credit. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
It’s a warm but drizzly day in Washington as people line up for the last argument of October Term 2017. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Maybe conservative activists have no burning desire to overrule Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:20 pm
See, e.g., Ripple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo argue that a federal mandate to wear masks to prevent the spread of coronavirus would be unconstitutional under NFIB v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:22 am
When our government charges different prices to different people for the same service, we cry “Unconstitutional! [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:36 am
But as R.A.V. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
Four years later, Gregg v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 11:59 am
Google and Langdon v. [read post]
