Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
The case also marks the debut of Harry Potter citations in the House of Lords. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:22 am
In Servedio v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
RSLs are subject to detailed housing management guidance, which is approved by the Secretary of State [10]. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
The House of Lords held, similarly, that Article 6 (1) and (2) guaranteed fair procedure and the presumption of innocence but did not place any obligation on States as regards the substantive contents of domestic law, including the mental or other elements of offences under domestic criminal law. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
"Clear enough.But then the Supreme Court held in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
It is the binding force of the House of Lords’ decisions which produce that result. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Lord Neuberger gave the judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
THe Advocate General submits that it is not about direct effect of these provisions, rather his point is about modification. 1426: The Advocate General states these provisions clearly modify the UK Act which is a protected enactment. 1419: The Advocate General returns to point raised by Lord Sumption and echoed by Lord Reed earlier today, being the introduction of general principles of EU LAW. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:12 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
The CA could not help observing that Flaux J “found himself unable to follow” observations of Lord Hoffman in R v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:03 pm
In England & Wales, Gina Millar, the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 has also commenced proceedings, with a hearing fixed for tomorrow, Thursday 5 September 2019 (interventions in those proceedings include the shadow Attorney General Shami Chakrabarti, the Welsh Government, the Scottish Government and the former Prime Minister Sir John… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am
Lord Clarke would have allowed the appeal on the basis that justice requires that the Prince should be allowed to challenge the claim against him, and all parties would be protected because the Court would be able to resolve all the issues between the parties. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
