Search for: "Louisiana v. United States" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Steve Hall
EJI today released a new report, “Illegal Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection: A Continuing Legacy,” which is the most comprehensive study of racial bias in jury selection since the United States Supreme Court tried to limit the practice in Batson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm by John Ehrett
§§ 921(a)(33)(A) and 922(g)(9) are unconstitutional under the Second, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am by Derek T. Muller
”The bar exam predates law school, tracing back in the United States to 1763. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
 The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining how these charges arose and by reviewing similar, earlier allegations that had been made against Rath:The stipulated factual basis for Rath's guilty plea provided as follows.Rath became acquainted with the victim and her family while stationed with the United States Army at the Fort Polk Military Reservation in Louisiana. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
United States, which discussed reasons for a less strict adherence to the court’s past decisions, as an example of a theory deserving of addition scholarly and legal scrutiny. [read post]