Search for: "Lynch v. Lynch" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 9:28 am by Unknown
But the statements were of fact, not opinion, and the verdict had a sufficient basis, the court reasoned (SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not comply… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:26 pm by John W. Arden
’s fraudulent scheme to market its epilepsy drug Neurontin for off-label uses (Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals also reinstates the plaintiff's Section 1983 equal protection claim against the County; the district court had vacated that verdict post trial.The case is Legg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The question raised in this case is whether certain entry-level accounts are entitled to overtime.The case is Pippins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Although both the System and the Hearing Officer, whose recommendation the Comptroller adopted, characterized the payments as having been made "in anticipation of eventual retirement" (emphasis provided in the decision) the Appellate Division noted that the term "eventual" is not part of the statutory standard and use of the term eventual actually reflects the Comptroller's own recognition that there was no actual retirement date anticipated in the memorandum… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
You have to satisfied strict standing policies as defined by the courts.The case is Connecticut Parents Union v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  As Harrington explains,Mishaps leading to mob violence and lynch justice jeopardized the core message of religious redemption and state authority. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 7:15 am by Evan Bernick
The 1848 language summarizes the holding of Lynch v. [read post]