Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 1521 - 1540 of 5,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
(Pix credit here: With eye on China, EU parliament pushes tougher line on investments)Europe appears to be faced, again, with the hard task of balancing its relations among frenemies while retaining its wealth. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am by Wolfgang Demino
Taylor, Appellant.Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 2 of Williamson County, No. 16-0379-CC2, Honorable Laura B. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
Areeda & H.Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law §15.02[B] (4th ed. 2017) (Areeda & Hovenkamp); Capital Imaging Assoc., P. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 7:19 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
The Kansas Constitution may endow district courts with subject matter jurisdiction over criminal cases generally. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Summer is almost over, but before I put away my flip flops and seer sucker suit here’s a last look at what has been a very busy summer in the field of ADA and FHA litigation. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:21 am by Christopher Wilkinson
As an initial matter, the new directive is unclear as to the status of the prior Directive 307. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Because LIBOR is now much lower now than it was in 2005, the first error results in a substantially inflated amount of interest.The second error is no matter of small potatoes either. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and well-established doctrine, those allegations are sufficient to survive Defendants' motion to dismiss. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed July 16, and belatedly ordered published on August 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) affirmed the trial court’s judgment setting aside the City of Fremont’s approvals of a mixed residential/retail project (“Project”) and related Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”), and ordering preparation of an EIR based on the Project’s potentially significant aesthetic and traffic impacts on the Niles historical district. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
The same day the Complaint was filed, the Plaintiffs moved for a TRO under Court of Chancery Rule 65(b). [read post]