Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
This is a good start, but it isn't the end.Why does it matter? [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:29 am
We bring in Brad Blickstein and Beatrice Seravello, Co-Heads, NewLaw Practice Group at Baretz+Brunelle to discuss the recently released B+B survey, “If You Build It, Will They Come? [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:29 am
We bring in Brad Blickstein and Beatrice Seravello, Co-Heads, NewLaw Practice Group at Baretz+Brunelle to discuss the recently released B+B survey, “If You Build It, Will They Come? [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 8:52 pm
""In the end it doesn't matter how many people toil on a work of art, or how much money is spent on it. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
Given that a Tor user has not voluntarily shared his IP address, it doesn’t matter that obtaining an IP address from a third party or a visited website would not be a search in other circumstances that did involve voluntarily sharing. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) One of the purposes of file inspection is to enable the public to obtain information about the patent, being information to which it is entitled in return for the exclusive monopoly rights which the patent confers (indeed, this is the “paramount” purpose of file inspection according to the Board in T 1401/05 [5]).[3.3] Examples where file inspection would not have served the purpose of informing the public about the patent are to be found in the decisions T… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
Rule 30(d)(3)(B) allows courts to limit the scope and manner of the deposition. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm
In these cases, a common interest for secrecy was assumed, either because there was a technical co-operation for the common development of a new product (see T 830/90) or for the manufacture of a product developed by the donor of the order (T 799/91). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 5:10 am
While AT&T had filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 50(a) before the case went to the jury, it failed to renew the motion through a Rule 50(b) motion after the verdict was rendered. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
I never for a minute thought the state would admit they executed an innocent person - no matter how obvious it is. [read post]
Easy Come, Easy Go: Legislature Removes Affidavit Requirement for Citizen-Initiated Criminal Process
9 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
I don’t know the details of the legal concerns, but I do know that dealing with complainants who couldn’t read or write, or who couldn’t read or write in English, was a challenge for magistrates. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:45 am
In this video presentation recorded by Adam B. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:56 pm
Back in my homeland, when an officer couldn't find any section of Idaho Code to fit a perceived 'crime,' he just made one up. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
One of the most active catalysts was a catalyst comprised by magnesium oxide stabilised with alumina (catalyst B). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
” G.S. 7B-4001, Article I, (b)(3). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Can’t make too big a list b/c then people claim anything not on the list is excluded. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
Depending on the concrete circumstances, there may be some truth to this, but the present decision shows that the argument will not always work.If you hate mechanics, you better not read on.The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division to refuse his application.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Power tool (1) having a drive motor (2) and a flange (3) connected to it so that it can be driven, wherein a disk (5), in particular a… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
AT&T Mobility LLC for consumer class actions (unlike many observers, I didn't see it as their end), then you might want to sit down before reading the Court's decision in Walmart v. [read post]
