Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2011, 3:37 am
How else might any such measure, in terms of both its purpose and effect (see Martin and Miller v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 10), be described other than as “relating to” these reserved aspects of the constitution ? [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:39 pm
” As a result, government mandates requiring people to speak are subject to strict scrutiny—the most stringent standard of judicial review in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:27 am
Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
That ruling then precipitated a dramatic political battle full of overblown claims of threats to America and eventually resulted in the passage of a measure expanding the NSA’s ability to intercept communications inside the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Wokeck & Martin A. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:43 am
Martin v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:41 pm
Thus Story’s statement in Martin v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
If you think all necessary evidence was admitted before the TTAB, you have the option of appealing the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
Jan. 7, 2008), a company brought Guatemalan and Mexican workers to the United States for seasonal employment under H-2B visas. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Supreme Court held in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
United Steelworkers (Ont. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
United States, 102 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
United States). [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:07 am
The importance of this initial consideration was recently reinforced in an August 2024 decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
Supreme Court decision, Carcieri v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:31 am
See Martin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
