Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 1521 - 1540 of 3,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Jack Goldsmith
Section 135(b) of the Bill establishes a 60-day period following transmittal of the agreement to Congress. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Counsel David Sherborne told the judge that the cases brought against Mirror Group Newspapers were “exceptional”, compared to other privacy actions. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Legal services rendered to a wife or minor child are, as a matter of law, necessaries for which a father may be held liable. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
 But to my ear, the (a) lyrics are different, the (b) rhythms of the two songs are different, and the (c) harmonies are different. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:26 pm
(David Kohl/AP) Some readers may recall last year’s Supreme Court decision in Susan B. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am by Jan von Hein
Peter Mankowski, International Jurisdiction in Insurance Matters: Professional Lessor as Injured Party and Standardized, not Case-by-case Assessment of Need of Protection The injured party can sue its opponent’s liability insurer at its own domicile under Art. 11 II in conjunction with Art. 9 I lit. b Brussels I Regulation/Art. 13 II in conjunction with Art. 11 I lit. b Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
Other than in the context of a disciplinary suspension, an employer does not, as a matter of law, have an implied authority to suspend an employee without such reasons,” said Justice Richard Wagner, who wrote on behalf of the 5-2 majority. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:35 am by Daniel Shaviro
  From a utilitarian standpoint, everyone in the world matters equally. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:00 am by David M. Boertje
Soliciting or engaging in prostitution (California Penal Code 647(b): Both the prostitute and the person accused of receiving sexual services can be charged with prostitution. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In this regard, some have worried about limitations on the use of ground forces.[2] Others have argued the problem is chiefly the three-year proposed sunset provision.[3] Still others have voiced concerns about both.[4] Yet both concerns are actually misplaced, at least as a legal matter, and for largely the same reasons. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:17 am
Jones, who has offered to pay me $1000 for them” involves the felon’s “constructive possession”, but (b) a request to “please ask licensed dealer X to sell my firearms” does not; or why (a) a request to “please transfer my firearms to my brother Jimmy” constitutes constructive possession, but not if Jimmy ends up buying the guns from the licensed dealer. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:28 pm
 It now claims that the 11th Circuit did not decide as a matter of law that Henderson couldn’t transfer his firearms to a willing buyer; rather, the government suggests, the court looked at the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the particular process that Henderson was proposing and decided that there was too much of a risk that he was, in fact, going to be exercising control over the firearms (“constructive possession”) after the purported sale… [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, defendant signed a waiver of immunity form that complied with the requirements of CPL 190.45 (1) and was therefore required to be permitted to testify before the grand jury (see CPL 190.50 [5] [b]). [read post]