Search for: "Matter of Lawrence" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
” But when Supreme Court Justices decide, after the fact, that they may have made a mistake, it is rarely a laughing matter. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:12 am
However, as with other types of Massachusetts domestic violence matters, the pendulum seems to have swung all the way in the opposite direction. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:24 pm by Dianne Saxe
An environmental assessment, no matter how “extensive and wide ranging”, does not amount to statutory authority, or provide a defence in nuisance, according to the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Appeal in Heyes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the ACSblog, Lawrence Fox argues that in McCoy, which the court will consider tomorrow, “[t]he Supreme Court should reverse, ensuring Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Solicitor General Lawrence Wallace, who “retired from the solicitor’s office in 2003 after arguing 157 cases before the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
 Here I want to offer two other possible explanations for Lemon's staying power in its zombie state. 1) As a general matter, the Supreme Court just doesn't like to overrule its precedents. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Staver thought well on his feet when Chief Justice George pointed to Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:21 am
As said, not to worry.** This posting represents the personal views of Lawrence R. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
ATTORNEY'S FEES, CONTRACTS, ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, INJURY AND TORT LAW Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
(I have in my files correspondences between Justice Brennan and Lawrence Tribe, who was a frequent litigant before the high court.) [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal also reviewed this provision in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:08 am
I disagree in this instance: I think same-sex marriage makes sense as a policy matter and that its denial violates equal protection. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm by John Culhane
It’s always been a state matter, Judge Tauro noted, so much so that whenever anyone in Congress thought that family law matters might be worth regulating, a constitutional amendment (that would vault over any other constitutional issues) rather than legislation was considered. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 2:55 pm by John Pfaff
But even then, I live in New York State, a state that legalized abortion before Roe, gay sex before Lawrence, and gay marriage before Windsor and Hollingsworth. [read post]