Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
The taking into account of this argument necessarily leads to the consideration of the applicant's argumentation concerning the inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Does it matter? [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
As for its common law trade dress, Reynolds claimed(a) the color scheme; (b) the use of the color scheme; (c) the use of prominent lettering within the blue section; (d) the use of silver bands to separate the blue and pink sections; (e) the placement of the quantity information; (f) the inclusion of the “made in the U.S.A. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:36 am
All this has led Christian Louboutin to issue a press release, suggesting that some of the reports of the Opinion could be considered … ‘fake news’ [here, here, here]:“While ordinarily Christian Louboutin does not comment directly on pending matters, we are making an exception in this instance to correct what appears to be misleading reports of the opinion of M. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
In D 11/18, a 2018 European Qualifying Exam candidate successfully appealed the decision of the Examination Board to fail his Paper B script (D 11/18). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 10:30 am
She is a Harvard Law School graduate who clerked for Justice Anthony M. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
See 19 USC 1514(b). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
§4 shall apply to accidents and dates of disablement which occur on and after such effective date; b. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Fred Jackson, Ronald Smith, and Ray M. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
" Both the individual and the community (state, religious community, social order, affinity group, it doesn't matter really) engage in these acts of extrapolation for purposes of self justification, [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
Since this judge seems to have weighed the factual elements of the § 875(c) offense and found them wanting, I’m assuming O’Dwyer is effectively absolved of liability for that crime based on the facts at issue here. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
This basic question has three different answers, all regularly used in any given jurisdiction—this is not a matter of circuit splits. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
THERE WILL BE NO ORAL INTERROGATORIES. : (one line description of what I’m looking for. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(b), 802.) [read post]
Applicability of the 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act to Arbitration Related Court Proceedings: Part I
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am
M/s Hindustan Construction Co. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am
(I omitted the substance of the chats (a) because I’m sure you can imagine what they said and (b) because they’d made this post way, way too long if I included them.) [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Every year, my distinguished colleague at Penn State, Jan M. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Entonces me fui e hice algo que me parecía más gratificante: pensar y discutir sobre las cosas que son más complejas, importantes y más recompensadoras. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
[I should note I think the Office is completely right in saying (1) §43(a)(1)(B) claims should survive Dastarwhere false attributions are material to consumers and (2) Dastar applies to in-copyright works as well. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
” The Court analyzed the question by (a) identifying the religious practice at issue; (b) identifying the government-imposed burden on that specific practice; and (c) determining whether that burden was substantial. [read post]
