Search for: "Matter of T."
Results 1521 - 1540
of 161,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 3:46 am
This one wasn’t. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The [opponent] referred to decisions T 755/96, T 1105/98, T 401/02 and T 153/85 in order to support his plea.The [opponent] also referred to the complexity of the amendments, in particular of the amended main request and the second auxiliary request. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus the disputed matter (Streitstoff) that is relevant for the appeal proceedings results from the SGA and the corresponding reply. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
The inventive step of the claimed subject-matter was objected to in view of A006 and D3a. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
” The board in decision T 1391/07 [2.6], referring to the above decisions of the EBA, saw no basis for extending the existing practice to “cover claims not defining the same subject-matter but conferring ... a scope of protection overlapping with each other only partially in the sense that some, but not all of the embodiments notionally encompassed by one of the claims would also be encompassed by the other one of the claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
There is an interesting final remark on the composition of the Examining Division (ED).[3] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal that for a decision to be reasoned it must contain a logical sequence of arguments and that all facts, evidence and arguments essential to the decision must be discussed in detail (see for instance T 278/00 [2-4]; T 1997/08 [4]).[4] The Boards of Appeal have consistently decided further that a request for a decision based on the current… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The photos D3 were filed as supporting evidence for this device as well.In the light of these “what”, “when” and “what circumstances”, the [opponent] concluded that novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 was not given.[1.6] As indicated in T 597/07 [2.5] of the reasons, according to the established case law, “it is not required for an opposition to be admissible that the arguments brought in support are conclusive or that the… [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
He didn't ask for clemency, didn't file any last minute motions for stay. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:56 am
But it clearly hasn't said that. [read post]
Statement of the Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers Regarding Budgetary Reductions to the Judicial Branch
15 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
For many of my clients, court dates can’t happen fast enough. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 7:03 am
NBC News: More than 6-in-10 likely Republican caucusgoers — 61% — say that it doesn’t matter to their support if former President Donald Trump is convicted of a crime before the general election, according to the latest numbers from the… Continue reading The post “Majority of Iowa caucusgoers say Trump conviction wouldn’t affect their support” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
CIV.A. 2:05CV443)Judge: T. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
No matter what happened, or how... [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:42 am
" The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Washington Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that student age doesn't matter in teacher-sex cases, even if the student is 18 and considered an adult by other state laws. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
In the Board’s view, such deletions must be considered admissible in accordance with the case law of the boards of appeal (see decision T 393/91 [2.2]). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm
Don’t Involve Kids in a Felony A Utah mom didn’t follow that particular piece of advice, though, when she took her two small children with her on a recent drive by shooting. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, this provision has undergone some change when the EPC 2000 entered into force. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
It doesn’t matter whether the records are paper or electronic – if the chain of custody is weak (or non-existent!) [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:15 am
Post-published evidence in support that the claimed subject-matter solves the technical problem the patent in suit purports to solve may be taken into consideration, if it is already plausible from the disclosure of the patent that the problem is indeed solved (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition, I.D.4.6; T 1329/04, point 12 of the Reasons; T 1043/10, point 12 or the Reasons).Thus, for post-published evidence to be taken into account, it is necessary to… [read post]
